<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Design Meltdown 2010 &#187; Horizontal Scrolling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://2010.designmeltdown.com/category/site-structure/horizontal-scrolling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://2010.designmeltdown.com</link>
	<description>Design elements, trends and patterns in web design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>30 Horizontal Websites</title>
		<link>http://2010.designmeltdown.com/2010/03/30-horizontal-websites/</link>
		<comments>http://2010.designmeltdown.com/2010/03/30-horizontal-websites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horizontal Scrolling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2010.designmeltdown.com/?p=291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The horizontal scrolling web site is a format that designers seem to return to time and time again. Whats interesting is that this is a style that really shows when someone is using it just to use it instead of finding a true need for it. Perfect example is that lots of photography sites use this approach, and it works well. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The horizontal scrolling web site is a format that designers seem to return to time and time again. Whats interesting is that this is a style that really shows when someone is using it just to use it instead of finding a true need for it. Perfect example is that lots of photography sites use this approach, and it works well. Photography is something that looks better side by side instead of stacked in a list.</p>
<p><a href="http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/galleries/design-trend-showcase-30-horizontal-websites/" target="_blank">http://vandelaydesign.com/blog/galleries/design-trend-showcase-30-horizontal-websites/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://2010.designmeltdown.com/2010/03/30-horizontal-websites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>20 Horizontal Scrollers</title>
		<link>http://2010.designmeltdown.com/2010/01/20-horizontal-scrollers/</link>
		<comments>http://2010.designmeltdown.com/2010/01/20-horizontal-scrollers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horizontal Scrolling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2010.designmeltdown.com/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out this new post on cssleak.com with 20 examples of horizontal scrolling web sites.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out this new post on <a href="http://www.cssleak.com" target="_blank">cssleak.com</a> with 20 examples of horizontal scrolling web sites:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cssleak.com/Category/Horizontal-Scrolling-Websites.html" target="_blank">http://www.cssleak.com/Category/Horizontal-Scrolling-Websites.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://2010.designmeltdown.com/2010/01/20-horizontal-scrollers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
